8.4 C
New York
Monday, March 4, 2024

Hopes on High, As Supreme Court May Release Nnamdi Kanu Today



- Advertisement -

By Izunna Okafor, Awka

In a pivotal development, the Supreme Court is poised to render a judgment today on the appeals brought forth by both the federal government and Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).

Recapping the proceedings, a distinguished five-member panel, presided over by Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, meticulously selected October 5 for the verdict subsequent to the conclusive statements made by the government’s legal representative, Tijani Gazali (SAN), and Kanu’s counsel, Mike Ozekhome (SAN).

The crux of the matter lies in the federal government’s earnest plea to overturn the Court of Appeal’s precedent, which nullified the treasonable felony charges against Kanu. The appellate court had gone a step further, ordering Kanu’s release on the grounds of an allegedly illicit return following his bail breach.

READ ALSO  Anambra Woman in Trouble, As Pastor Kills Child She Handed over to Him without Husband's Consent, Cuts Off His Toe, Returns the Corpse to Them

Conversely, Kanu fervently urges the Supreme Court to validate the Court of Appeal’s judgment, thereby securing his exoneration and freedom.

Gazali passionately implores the court to set aside the appellate court’s decision and unequivocally endorse the initial Federal High Court judgment, compelling Kanu to face trial.

In a counter stance, Ozekhome ardently appeals to the court to dismiss the government’s appeal, accompanied by consequential costs, while simultaneously upholding Kanu’s cross-appeal, an entreaty grounded in the pursuit of what he deems “substantial justice.”

The backdrop of this legal saga dates back to October 13, 2022, when the Court of Appeal, situated in Abuja, scrutinized and criticized the government’s methodology in repatriating Kanu. The court, in a decisive move, quashed seven counts within the overarching treasonable felony charge, asserting that the government had transgressed established protocols and international laws during Kanu’s arrest in Kenya.

READ ALSO  Protest rocks Anambra community over alleged encroachment into their land despite series of court judgements

The ensuing legal drama saw the federal government, in a bid for a reprieve, seeking a stay of execution, a plea that found favor with the Court of Appeal, temporarily halting Kanu’s release as mandated by the appellate court.

Preceding these events, Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court had earlier stricken eight counts from the original charge against Kanu. The Court of Appeal subsequently quashed seven additional counts, bringing us to the current juncture where the Supreme Court stands poised to deliver a verdict that could significantly impact the trajectory of Nnamdi Kanu’s legal odyssey.

Hey there! Exciting news - we've deactivated our website's comment provider to focus on more interactive channels! Join the conversation on our stories through Facebook, Twitter, and other social media pages, and let's chat, share, and connect in the best way possible!

Join or social media

For even more exclusive content!

Of The Week


- Advertisement -

Of The Week

247Ureports Protects its' news articles from plagiarism as an important part of maintaining the integrity of our website.