8.4 C
New York
Thursday, April 25, 2024

Court to hear suit seeking Buhari, Atiku’s disqualification over campaign expenses, June 27

Published:

LATEST NEWS

- Advertisement -

The Federal High Court Abuja, has fixed June 27, to hear a suit challenging the campaign funding of President Muhammadu Buhari, and the Presidential Candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar in their 2019 campaigns.

The suit was filed by the presidential candidate of the National Rescue Movement (NRM), Usman Alhaji, asking the court to nullify the participation of Buhari and Atiku in Feb. 23 Presidential poll.

Alhaji prayed the court to disqualify Bihari and Atiku because they spent above the amount provided for by the Electoral Act in their campaigns.

Specifically, the plaintiff is praying the court to set aside the participation of Buhari and Atiku on the grounds that they spent more than N1 billion each, as campaign expenses.

READ ALSO  IGP Withdraws All Security Personnel Attached To Fleeing Kogi Ex-Gov, Yahaya Bello

Others joined as defendants in the suit are: the All Progressives Congress, the Peoples Democratic Party, (PDP) and the Independent National Electoral Commission, (INEC).

The suit was filed by Mr Ezekiel Ofou, who urged the court to invoke Section 91(2) of the Electoral Act, 2010 to nullify the participation of Buhari and Atiku in the poll for allegedly violating the electoral laws.

When the matter was called on Tuesday, Buhari and the APC were represented by counsel.
However, there was no legal representation for Atiku, the PDP and INEC.

Ofou informed the court that the matter was slated for further hearing, adding that all parties had been duly served with relevant processes.

READ ALSO  Abia: Ex- Commissioner, Kalu Reacts Over N107.2bn Airport Project Fraud By Ikpeazu

He urged the court to deem the matter as mentioned and fix a date for hearing since there had been several adjournments for mentioning.

Since there was no objection from Buhari’s counsel, the trial judge, Justice Ahmed Mohammed, adjourned the matter until June 27, for hearing.

The judge further directed that hearing notices be served on the defendants who were absent in court.

Hey there! Exciting news - we've deactivated our website's comment provider to focus on more interactive channels! Join the conversation on our stories through Facebook, Twitter, and other social media pages, and let's chat, share, and connect in the best way possible!

Join our social media

For even more exclusive content!

Of The Week
CARTOON

TOP STORIES

- Advertisement -

Of The Week
CARTOON

247Ureports Protects its' news articles from plagiarism as an important part of maintaining the integrity of our website.