Controversy Resurfaces Over Peter Obi’s Role, Legal Challenges Following 2013 Ezu River Corpse Discovery

Published:

LATEST NEWS

- SUPPORT US -spot_imgspot_img

AWKA — The claims surrounding the historic 2013 Ezu River incident have resurfaced, drawing scrutiny over the timeline of events, the role of former Governor Peter Obi, and subsequent legal battles during the #EndSARS panels.

WATCH VIDEO

Residents of the Amansea community on the border of Anambra and Enugu states discovered dozens of decomposed male corpses floating in the Ezu River. While initial local estimates claimed over 30 to 50 bodies, official police and Senate investigative reports eventually accounted for between 18 and 35 corpses. No definitive video of “singing youths” has ever been officially linked by forensic investigators to the floating victims.

At the time of the discovery, Peter Obi was serving as the Governor of Anambra State. In immediate response to the crisis, Obi visited the scene, expressed deep shock, and placed a ₦5 million bounty on information to help identify the bodies or apprehend those responsible.

READ ALSO  Senate Panel Grills SEDC Boss Mark Okoye Over N16.6bn Allocation and N153m One-Room Abuja Office Rent
Peter Obi Dissatisfied With NDC Ticket Sales But Resolves to Stay and Fix the Party
Peter Obi

Subsequent independent investigations conducted by civil liberty groups heavily indicted the Awkuzu headquarters of the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS), led by then-CSP James Nwafor. The reports alleged that the bodies belonged to detained suspects, including members of a separatist group, who had been extrajudicially executed and dumped into the river under the cover of night.

Regarding the #EndSARS Judicial Panel of Inquiry in 2020, records show that Peter Obi did not obtain a court injunction to evade investigation for the killings. Instead, his legal team approached the Anambra State Judicial Panel to request the dismissal of a specific petition filed by a hotelier whose property the Obi administration had demolished in 2013.

READ ALSO  Akpabio Slams Security Agencies As Bandits Flaunt Ransom Cash On Social Media With Impunity

Obi’s lawyers argued that the panel lacked jurisdiction because the specific case was already before the court, with active lawsuits pending before the Court of Appeal where the hotelier was seeking ₦5 billion in damages. The legal challenge was handled within the panel’s procedural rules rather than through a separate, external court injunction to block an inquiry into the Ezu River massacre itself.

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img

Hey there! Exciting news - we've deactivated our website's comment provider to focus on more interactive channels! Join the conversation on our stories through Facebook, Twitter, and other social media pages, and let's chat, share, and connect in the best way possible!

SUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM�
- SUPPORT US -spot_img

Join our social media

For even more exclusive content!

- Advertisement -spot_img

TOP STORIES

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Of The Week
CARTOON