Loading ...The Tax Appeal Tribunal has declared as illegal, null and void the decision of ECO Bank Nigeria Limited to pay N5, 545,000,000 as dividends to its shareholders in 2016.
That year, Eco bank had claimed it made no taxable profit and rather declared losses from its banking operation.
A statement from the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) said the tribunal reached this decision in its judgement dated February 20, 2020 which it delivered in Appeal No. TAT/LZ/CIT/024/2018.
Consequently, ECO Bank must now pay at least N1, 663,500,000 to the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) as Company Income Tax for the year in dispute โ 2016.
ECO Bank had dragged the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) to court over the insistence of the Service that the bank must pay in full its excess dividend tax liability of N2, 079,375,000, inclusive of interest and penalty for the Year of Assessment (YOA) 2016.
But ECO Bank argued that the dividend it paid out was tax exempt as N4,372,244,556 out of the total sum was โprofit from bonds and treasury billsโ, which was not taxable based on the provisions of the Company Income Tax (Exemption of Bonds and Short-Term Government Securities) Order, 2011.
Admitting to only making N1,172755,444 โtrading profitsโ from other business sources, ECO Bank decided that it would only pay N351,826,663 tax to the FIRS, which it paid the Service after some months of delay.
However, the FIRS โdemanded for the immediate payment of the outstanding excess dividend tax liability of N1,311,673,367โ from the bank, which impasse led to the suit before the tax tribunal.
In its argument before the court, ECO Bank presented three issues for determination, namely whether the FIRS โwas correct to assess the Appellant to tax under Section 19 of CITAโ when the income earned was โfrom Bonds, Treasury Bills and other Government Securitiesโ; whether the FIRS โmisdirected itself by failing to take account the CIT paid by the Appellantโ; and โwhether by the rules of Interpretation of Statutes, the Respondent has erred in law in its application of Section 19 of CITAโ.
In its consideration of the three issues raised, the tax tribunal resolved them in favour of the FIRS. It held that โcompanies that invest in bonds will, by virtue of the tax exemption, become liable to pay excess dividend tax on their profits.โ
The court averred that โif the tax exemption granted by the order (Company Income Tax (Exemption of Bonds and Short-Term Government Securities) Order, 2011) creates an excess dividend situationโ ECO Bank or any other company โshould be liable to pay excess dividend tax on the same income that otherwise would have been exempted from tax.โ
The tribunal stressed that โa liability to pay excess dividend tax arises where a company that seeks to pay dividend has no taxable profit as in the instant case but has distributable profit that is higher than the taxable profit.โ
The tribunal also held that the FIRS properly directed itself by not failing โto take into account the sum already settled by the Appellantโ (ECO Bank) in the Serviceโs โtotal assessment of N1, 663,500,000.โ
Addressing the final issue for determination, the tax tribunal headed by Prof. A.B. Ahmed also found that the FIRS did not err โin law in its application of Section 19 of CITA,โ stressing that the law was enacted to address the โmischiefโ which corporate entities resort to as tax avoidance schemes under which they twisted โthe law to suit their own endsโ, especially to โprevent shareholders from sharing dividend without payment of tax for whatever reason.โ
Consequently, the tribunal declared that the ECO Bank โappeal fails and is hereby dismissed.โ
