Democrats take control of the House, but Trump voters bolster Republicans in the Senate

Published:

LATEST NEWS

- SUPPORT US -spot_imgspot_img

Can INEC Still Be Trusted?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Propelled by an unprecedented surge of rank-and-file enthusiasm and widespread urban and suburban dissatisfaction with President Trump, Democrats tookย control of the House of Representatives for the first time since 2011.

The party was even projectedย to gain more seats than in 2006, the year they delivered what then-President George W. Bush described as a โ€œthumping.โ€

โ€œThanks to you we owned the ground,โ€ House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi โ€” likely the next House speaker โ€” said Tuesday night. โ€œThanks to you, tomorrow will be a new day in America.โ€

Yet with victories in Tennessee, Indiana, North Dakota, Missouri, Florida and Texas, Donald Trumpโ€™s Republican Party extended its majority in the U.S. Senate, capitalizing on a lopsided battlefield that forced Democrats to defend 10 seats in states Trump won in 2016.

The divergent outcome is largely a repudiation of Trump, who told a rally last month in Mississippi to โ€œpretend Iโ€™m on the ballotโ€ โ€” and a partial vindication.

It all depends which side of the widening gap between Red America and Blue America you stand on.

Voters turned out in record numbers to render a verdict on Trump after two years in which he has monopolized the media, polarized the electorate and dominated American political life like no president since Franklin Roosevelt โ€” or arguably ever.

As the last ballots trickled in, it became clear that Americaโ€™s verdict wasnโ€™t mixed so much as divided.ย The red, rural parts of the country voted heavily Republican. The blue, urban parts voted heavily Democrat. And the purple, suburban areas leaned leftward โ€” far enough to flip dozens of suburban GOP House districts, but not far enough to save moderate Democratic senators such as Claire McCaskill and Joe Donnelly in conservative strongholds such as Missouri and Indiana.

Winning the Senate was always a long shot. Still, the party was depending on Donnelly, McCaskill and Floridaโ€™s Bill Nelson to hold their seats, and hoping that Phil Bredesen, a popular and moderate former governor, could eke out a win against GOP Rep. Marsha Blackburn. In Texas, Beto Oโ€™Rourke became a folk hero for liberals who thought he might defy gravity and defeat Sen. Ted Cruz, the Republican.

It was not to be.

Democrats faced serious hurdles this cycle. Republicans largely oversaw the last round of redistricting, redrawing the congressional map in ways that force Democrats to win the national popular vote by seven or more percentage points just to secure a bare House majority. On the Senate side, Democrats were defending 26 seats to the GOPโ€™s nine โ€” by far the most difficult map either party has faced in decades. Republicans in some red states passed a set of restrictive voting laws that disproportionately handicap Democratic constituencies. Finally, the economy is humming and unemployment has fallen to a 48-year low โ€” factors that traditionally boost the party in power.

None of that, however, prevented Democrats from flipping the House.ย In suburban, GOP-held districts that voted for Clinton in 2016, Democrats performed well: Republican Rep. Carlos Curbelo of Miami, a moderate who co-founded the House climate change caucus, lost to his Democratic challenger, as did Northern Virginiaโ€™s Barbara Comstock, New Jerseyโ€™s Leonard Lance,ย Dallasโ€™s Pete Sessions, Minnesotaโ€™s Erik Paulsen and Coloradoโ€™s Mike Coffman.ย And strong showings in Richmond and Oklahoma City, where GOP incumbents Dave Brat and Steve Russell went down in defeat, suggested Democrats could continue to pick off Trump districts and cushion their likely victory.

READ ALSO  Invasion Threat: Finally, USA Military Submits Contingency Plan To Strike Terrorists In Nigeria

A Democratic win in the House will provide a crucial check on GOP rule and usher in a class of lawmakers in both Washington, D.C. and state capitals across America that will be younger, more female, more diverse and more progressive than any in U.S. history. Their ranks include the first two Muslim women in Congress, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Illhan Omar of Minnesota; Jared Polis of Colorado, the first openly gay man to be elected governor of any state; andย Sharice David of Kansas, the first Native American woman in Congress as well as the Sunflower Stateโ€™s first openly gay representative.

The contours of a Democratic House victory took shape early on.

In previous cycles, Democrats had failed to field challengers in tons of politically promising districts, conceding hundreds of seats up and down the ballot to uncontested GOP incumbents.ย But 2017 and 2018 attracted droves of diverse, often rookie candidatesย appalled by Trump and itching to โ€œresist.โ€ By Dec. 31, 2017, more than 2,100 people had filed paperwork to run for the House or Senate, theย mostย since the Federal Election Commission started keeping track in 1977. At that point,ย 510 Democratic House challengersย had raised $50,000 or more, just shy of the GOPโ€™s record-setting total (522) from 2010 โ€” the year Republicans wound up flipping 63 seats and retaking control. By the end of primary season, Democrats were challenging all but 10 Republican representatives โ€”ย an unprecedented featย that eventually helped the party capitalize on Election Day.

Women played a key part in this recruitment boom. Amid the backdrop of the broader #MeToo movement,ย more women launched campaignsย this cycle for the U.S Senate (53), U.S. House (476), governorโ€™s mansion (61) and state legislature (3,388) than ever before. Many were first-time candidates; most were Democrats. Activism among women โ€” especially college-educated suburban women โ€”skyrocketed as well.

Money was also on the Democratsโ€™ side.ย Overall,ย 65 percent of this election cycleโ€™s House donationsย have gone to Democratic candidates.ย During the last 20 years, Democrats have only topped the 50 percent mark once before (in 2008), and neither party has ever raked in more than 57 percent.ย Over the past three months, more than 90 percent of House Democratic candidates in competitive races outraised their Republican rivals.

Meanwhile, the statewide returns were not as dire for Democrats as their Senate losses made it seem. While Democrats lost marquee governorโ€™s races in Florida and Ohio โ€” and trailed in Georgia, where breakout star Stacey Abrams refused to concede to Republican Brian Kemp โ€” they picked up at least six governorโ€™s mansions overall and one hotly contested Senate seat in Nevada, where Rep. Jacky Rosen edged out incumbent Republican Sen. Dean Heller.

Yet in some ways the bitter polarization of the results reinforced Trumpโ€™s view of the country andย validated the blunt-force messaging that heย imposed on the campaign during its final days.

Trump brought prophecies of the apocalypse to red America, passing up the opportunity to run on positive economic news or appeals to a positive vision of the country.

The president did talk about GDP growth and low unemployment at campaign events, but he has always said he never gets credit for anything, and so he campaigned as if that were true. He was reportedly angered byย an adย produced by his reelection campaign that touted the economy and showed a mother watching her daughter grow up, preferring a commercial that demonized immigrants by portraying them as violent criminals. That ad was deemed so racist that every TV network โ€” even Fox News โ€” ย rejected it.

READ ALSO  Nigeriaโ€™s โ€œCountry of Particular Concernโ€ Designation: A Moment of Reckoning and Opportunity

He held 30 rallies over the final five weeks, and 14 rallies over the final two weeks, in large arenas and on airport tarmacs, where he talked about aย migrant caravanpassing from Central American countries into Mexico as if it were massed on the U.S. border, despite a U.S. militaryย assessmentย that said they expected 20 percent of the 7,000 or so people in the caravan to actually reach the U.S.-Mexico border, and not until a few weeks from now.

Trump called the refugees an โ€œinvasion.โ€ He floated conspiracy theories about Democrats and billionaireย George Sorosย having something to do with the caravan, but offered no proof. He described those in the caravan as dangerous criminals, andย speculatedย that some might be terrorists from Middle Eastern countries, which also contradicted intelligenceย findingsย from the U.S. military.

The unsubstantiated claims and accusations were so many, and so wild, that Trump overloaded the circuits of anyone trying to keep track of whether any of it was actually true.

But Trumpโ€™s appeal to his core supporters has always been centered around an โ€œus vs. themโ€ mentality, and his message built on that narrative.

Mike Braun, Marsha Blackburn and Ted Cruz. (Photo: Michael Conroy/AP, Mark Humphrey/AP, Mike Segar/Reuters)

The theory here was that many of those who voted for Trump in 2016 were nontraditional voters who might have rarely, if ever, voted in a midterm election. They resembled the โ€œlow propensityโ€ and โ€œlow informationโ€ voters that so often bolstered Democratic candidates in presidential elections, but failed to show up in midterm elections.

A top Republican source with knowledge of voter data held by the Republican National Committee told Yahoo News the number of Trump voters who were non-traditional midterm voters had become an โ€œobsessionโ€ for key GOP operatives, and that this voting bloc had become key in many contests Republicans hoped to win.

So Trumpโ€™s fear-mongering message was a tool meant to activate voters who cared little for the intricacies of policy or governance and sometimes even facts, but who would be eager to continue the movement that Trump started in 2016.

The bottom line for many of Trumpโ€™s supporters was that the president โ€” stymied in their view by Congress as he sough to build a wall across the entire southern border โ€” was doing something, anything, rather than nothing.

Trump ordered 7,000 U.S. militaryย troops to portions of the borderย in Texas, and said that number could double.

He also floated the idea of revoking birthright citizenship through executive order, something he has no power to do.

The question was whether Trumpโ€™s inflammatory approach would alienate middle-of-the road voters who lean conservative but donโ€™t like him.

The answer was that in key Senate states like Indiana and Tennessee, enough voters craved red meat. But in the rest of America, Trumpโ€™s rhetoric drove Democrats to the polls โ€” and Republicans to defeat.

Even Trump seemed conflicted on the eve of the election.

โ€œI would like to have a much softer tone,โ€ Trumpย toldย the conservative Sinclair Broadcasting Group on Monday.

But, he added, โ€œI feel, to a certain extent, I have no choice.โ€

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img

Hey there! Exciting news - we've deactivated our website's comment provider to focus on more interactive channels! Join the conversation on our stories through Facebook, Twitter, and other social media pages, and let's chat, share, and connect in the best way possible!

SUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM๏ฟฝ
- SUPPORT US -spot_img

Join our social media

For even more exclusive content!

TOP STORIES

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Of The Week
CARTOON