8.4 C
New York
Sunday, December 22, 2024

Sanusi Lamido Sanusi Challenges SSS, FG To Produce Evidence Of His Terrorism Involvement

Published:

- Advertisement -

LATEST NEWS

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img
Mallam-Lamido-Sanusi
Mallam-Lamido-Sanusi

Former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Sanusi Lamido Sanusi,Former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), denied being a major financier of Boko Haram group in the country.

 

 

He also maintained that Federal Government had failed to substantiate the allegation of terrorism financing leveled against him.

 

He who spoke through his lawyer, Kola Awodehin (SAN) at the resumed hearing of his fundamental human rights enforcement suit before a Lagos Federal High Court .

 

 

Kola Awodehin (SAN)  insisted that the allegation of terrorism financing slammed on his clent by the government was a figment of imagination as it never produced any evidence before the court to back up such claim.

READ ALSO  SFC Ends Year with in a Special Way, Says Soludo's Achievements Have Paved the Way for His 2nd Term Journey

 

 

He said:”The allegations against the applicant as to funding of terrorism, is an after thought by the respondent, which is not backed by facts, as there is no reasonable suspicion that the applicant committed any crime.

 

 

 

“The law clearly defines how such duties should be performed, and so, I invite your lordship to hold that the applicant has a cause of action against the respondent.

 

 

 

Kola Awodehin (SAN) drew the court’s attention to the provisions of section 251 of the Constitution which provides in its preamble that “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary— the Federal High Court shall have jurisdiction in civil causes.

READ ALSO  STAMPEDE: Corpses Litter Ground, As Less Privileged Struggle for Christmas Rice in Anambra, Police React

 

 

He also said the seizure of the applicant’s international passport by the third respondent, is a derogation of his freedom of movement.

 

 

 

“The first to third respondents give conflicting reasons as to the complaint made against the applicant: This conflict goes to show that they acted without due process of the law.

 

 

 

“The allegations against the applicant as to funding of terrorism, is an after thought by the respondent, which is not backed by facts, as there is no reasonable suspicion that the applicant committed any crime.

- Advertisement -spot_img

Hey there! Exciting news - we've deactivated our website's comment provider to focus on more interactive channels! Join the conversation on our stories through Facebook, Twitter, and other social media pages, and let's chat, share, and connect in the best way possible!

Join our social media

For even more exclusive content!

- Advertisement -spot_img

TOP STORIES

- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -

Of The Week
CARTOON

247Ureports Protects its' news articles from plagiarism as an important part of maintaining the integrity of our website.