Everybody in Nigeria wants unity and peace. Every day they keep crying out for peace but nobody is crying out for justice. Every aspect of life in Nigeria is steeped in injustice. There is something not quite right with the thought process of we black people. At every corner there is injustice, but what is most painful is that whereas in other areas of the world where black people are not in control of the government you can notice some measure of human progress, in black Africa we appear to sinking lower and lower into the darkness of oppression and injustice. Take what is happening in South Africa as an example. The killing of other black people is happening daily, the same black people from other African countries that fought to end apartheid. Black South Africans who are today killing their fellow blacks, never had the courage to kill a white person.
It was the parents of the same black people they are killing now on their streets that fought for the end of apartheid. This is why we want Biafra, a land that will prove to the world that a black race is capable of being civilised and just.
NIGERIA AND LAWLESSNESS AIDED AND ABATED BY JUDGES LIKE BINTA NYAKO, NJC, JOHN TSOHO, POLICE, ARMY, ASO ROCK, IGBO SOCIO-CULTURAL ASSOC. AND IGNORANCE OF THE POPULACE.
Let us begin by looking at the highest levels of lawlessness in the Zoo called Nigeria. Take the appointment of a Chief Justice of the Federation for example. Ask yourself this question, how did Nigeria end up with a Sharia Court Judge as the Chief Justice of a Common Law judiciary. Some Nigerians in their God given ignorance think Sharia law/Civil Law and Common law legal systems are the the same. That is how daft some of them are.
In Nigeria the process of breaking the law or disregard for the rule of law starts from the very top of the government, right through the upper echelons of the judiciary and the law courts and down to their DSS, army and police because citizens don’t know that disobedience to established law and order by the presidency, judiciary and NJC is the reason why Nigeria, the great Zoo, is the Wild Wild West that it is today. For example, what does the Constitution of Nigeria have to say about the appointment of a Chief Justice and has that simple process been followed in the removal of Onnoghen and appointment of Tanko the Sharia judge that replaced him?
For this let us refer ourselves to the 1999 Nigerian Constitution……..#
Chapter VII: The Judicature
231. 1.
The appointment of a person to the office of a Justice of the Supreme Court shall be made by the President on the National Judicial Council subject to confirmation of such appointment by the senate.
A person shall not be qualified to hold the office of Chief Justice of Nigeria or a Justice of the Supreme Court, unless he is qualified to practice as a legal practitioner in Nigeria and has been so qualified for a period of not less than fifteen years.
If the office of Chief Justice of Nigeria is vacant or if the person holding the office is for any reason unable to perform the functions of the office, then until a person has been appointed to and has assumed the functions of that office, or until the person holding has resumed those functions, the President shall appoint the most senior Justice of the Supreme Court to perform those functions.
Except on the recommendation of the National Judicial Council, an appointment pursuant to the provisions of subsection (4) of this section shall cease to have effect after the expiration of three months from the date of such appointment, and the President shall not re-appointment a person whose appointment has lapsed.
NJC is confused….. It’s most unfortunate that the so called NJC doesn’t know their constitution or out of fear have refused to insist that the government be held accountable to its dictates. Which section in the constitution empowers the cabal through Jubril Al-Sudani to suspend CJN without court any conviction or initial recommendation of the NJC? And where in the constitution did Aso Rock derive the power to dismiss or suspend the Chief Justice of the Federation? NJC should bury their head in shame.
According to the NJC, Justice Walter Onnoghen had lost the morality of authority to continue as Nigerian chief justice over the litany of allegations bordering on misconduct. The question is, who determined that he has lost the moral authority, is it a properly constituted court of law or the Fulani cabal in Aso Rock running Nigeria that wants their own Fulani Islamist to take over the reigns of the judiciary the same way they succeeded in taking over every other sphere of authority and governance in Nigeria. But has he been convicted of any crime? You can all see where Nigerian judges got their stupidity from. Mere allegation and you are guilty. Who did this to black people. Why is it difficult for us to reason like human beings. Where is that cornerstone of justice that says presumption of innocence before proven guilty? Do you see how Fulani is debasing not just our reasoning ability but our morality too.
To understand why Onnoghen was removed, you have to first of all appreciate who the chairman of the same NJC that made the recommendation is. Let us look at the composition of the National Judicial Council as prescribed in the Nigerian Constitution.
National Judicial Council
The National Judicial Council shall comprise the following members-
the Chief Justice of Nigeria who shall be the Chairman; (the Fulani Tanko Muhammad appointed by Abba Kyari and the rest of the cabal through their Sudanese impostor Jubril Al Sudani is now the chairman of the same NJC that recommended the resignation of Onnoghen when no court of law as prescribed in the constitution has ever found him guilty of nay offence.
The same National Judicial Council therefore which has the:
a. the Chief Justice of Nigeria who shall be the Chairman; (the same Fulani Sharia Chief Justice appointed by the cabal through Jubril Aminu Al Sudani the impostor impersonating the dead and long gone Buhari, whose rotten corpse is in a shallow grave in Saudi Arabia. The same Chief Justice Tanko who now recommended that Onnoghen should leave the service while he himself is squeaky clean. No wonder injustice pervades every layer of legal practice in Nigeria. If the parent body can be so parochial, deviant and evil, how much less those they are meant to hold in check like Binta Nyako and other judges in Nigeria.
In Binta Nyako’s court and many courts across Nigeria detention centres like DSS dungeons, cells in army barracks, police cells and SARS organ harvesting facilities across Nigeria, innocent people are held without charge or denied appearance before a court for years. I met many people in DSS dungeons in Lagos and Abuja who have been in the same spot for 4 years without seeing sunlight talk less of the inside of a court room. The number of Biafrans in detention including those arrested from so-called Niger Delta are in their thousands. They are all languishing in various detention facilities in the north whereas Boko Haram terrorists and Fulani herdsmen are being recruited into the Nigerian army.
Justice Udeh – arrested in Ohafia taken to Abuja
Emmanual Chigbo – arrested in Enugu taken to Abuja | DID ANY OF THESE PEOPLE COMMIT ANY CRIME IN ABUJA?
Uchenna Emenike – arrested in Enugu taken to Abuja
It won’t surprise me that they too will be killed and their organs harvested and sold to India.
EYEWITNESS ACCOUNT OF DAYLIGHT ROBBERY, LAW ENFORCEMENT GONE HORRIBLY WRONG
Now let us look at what the POLICE has been doing:
If you don’t give police money in Enugu State you will be locked up in a police cell or worse taken to prison. A court of law with a presiding magistrate will now read you a fabricated charge and detain you for another after 21 days after which they will tell you to you go and seek for bail applications in High Court because suddenly they no longer have jurisdiction to hear your case. At this time, one useless legal practitioner will approach your family and tell them, “I will apply for motion for bail for the inmate”. Suddenly you are an inmate. From defending the means of your livelihood against a ravenous and unconscionable police force, you have now become an accused person. The criminal lawyer will take 50K from your family and when this innocent man appear in court, the same lawyer will approach the family and demand for an appearance fee. After that, the lawyer will give the family another bill of 250K. It is now in the interest of the lawyer to that this victim of police robbery is detained indefinitely because every court appearance earns him 5K appearance fee. As the case progresses with an innocent man in jail, the lawyer will quietly disappear, you will never see them again. This is the height of wickedness in Nigeria. It appears as if every layer of the legal profession is agreement to undermine due process not just Jubril and his Aso Rock handlers. I wonder if this is what they are taught in their law school.
[Let us look now look at how the likes of Binta Nyako and the Nigerian judiciary has been making a mess of their own constitution]
it should be noted that the 1999 Constitution is the highest law of the land in Nigeria. maybe we should all have a look to see what the constitution says about arrest, charge, detention and bail.
Every constitution in the world is the same. It is written in as much plain English as possible and for the purposes of our in-depth research tonight, we must understand that present Nigerian Constitution is written in plain understandable English not Shakespearian, Dickensian or Chaucer English. It is written in such a way that any person with a fine grasp of English will be able to comprehend it. You don’t need any specialist training in law.
This is Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights as written in the Nigerian Constitution
Any person who is arrested or detained shall have the right to remain silent or avoid answering any question until after consultation with a legal practitioner or any other person of his own choice.
Any person who is arrested or detained shall be informed in writing within twenty-four hours (and in a language that he understands) of the facts and grounds for his arrest or detention.
Any person who is arrested or detained in accordance with subsection (1) (c) of this section shall be brought before a court of law within a reasonable time, and if he is not tried within a period of-
two months from the date of his arrest or detention in the case of a person who is in custody or is not entitled to bail; or
three months from the date of his arrest or detention in the case of a person who has been released on bail,
he shall (without prejudice to any further proceedings that may be brought against him) be released either unconditionally or upon such conditions as are reasonably necessary to ensure that he appears for trial at a later date.
• Extradition procedure
In subsection (4) of this section, the expression “a reasonable time” means-
in the case of an arrest or detention in any place where there is a court of competent jurisdiction within a radius of forty kilometres, a period of one day; and
in any other case, a period of two days or such longer period as in the circumstances may be considered by the court to be reasonable.
Any person who is unlawfully arrested or detained shall be entitled to compensation and public apology from the appropriate authority or person; and in this subsection, “the appropriate authority or person” means an authority or person specified by law.
Somebody should please ask Binta Nyako why she insisted on going ahead with the case involving Bright Chimezie Ishinwa when a Federal High Court in Uyo with the same powers as her court had earlier ordered DSS to pay compensation to Bright Chimezie Ishinwa for unlawful detention. She allowed the sham charge of conspiracy to commit treasonable felony to be brought before here because she is doing her bit for the fraudulent One Nigeria.
Is it not clear from the express provisions of the constitution that nobody should be detained for more that two months without trial or at least the benefit of automatic bail? But Nigerian courts and their judges will tell you that certain offences are not ordinarily bailable. What an utter nonsense. We have IPOB family members in detention for over 2 years and I met people in detention who have spent nearly 3 years in solitary confinement contrary to the provisions of the law. The saddest part is that Nigerian judges are aware of these cases but have chosen to defy the constitution they swore to uphold in order to swelling the coffers of the various government agencies responsible for their detention. This is a racket. Nigerian judges are in illicit agreement with the Ministry of Interior to keep innocent people locked up because of the extortionate 20, 000 Naira they collect from the government to feed each detainee. There is no other plausible justification for the detention of hundreds of thousands of innocent souls the constitution says should be released.
WE LOOK AT THE ISSUE OF MY BAIL REVOCATION AGAIN AND THE HEIGHT OF BINTA NYAKO’S JUDICIAL BANDITRY.
We all recall what happened with the hype around the issue of my sureties. How Binta Nyako played up the responsibility of the sureties as if it was Abaribe and the rest of the sureties that instigated the army to invade my home. We all know it was certain Igbo men in Ohaneze Ndigbo, Ikpeazu, Umahi, Obiano and a few others that actively sought my assassination. They can enjoy all the protection from their Fulani masters as they like but eventually they will be held accountable for their crimes.
LET US LOOK AT WHAT THE 1999 CONSTITUTION SAYS ABOUT SENDING A BATTALION OF COWARDLY NIGERIAN SOLDIERS TO MY HOUSE TO KILL ME
Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights
33. 1. Every person has a right to life, and no one shall be deprived intentionally of his life, save in execution of the sentence of a court in respect of a criminal offence of which he has been found guilty in Nigeria.
2. A person shall not be regarded as having been deprived of his life in contravention of this section, if he dies as a result of the use, to such extent and in such circumstances as are permitted by law, of such force as is reasonably necessary-
for the defence of any person from unlawful violence or for the defence of property;
in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained; or
for the purpose of suppressing a riot, insurrection or mutiny.
We all remember that Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/383/2015 came up on the 14th day of November, 2018 was for the sureties to the Applicant to show cause why the bail bond should not be forfeited. This is according to court records. At the end of that proceedings, Binta Nyako the presiding judge gave her ruling and this was what she said according to her own records…..and I quote:
“The sureties have still not produced the Defendant. In the interim, the court hereby, orders that the sureties in the interim deposit the bail bond in court within two (2) months from today for six months or the bail will be forfeited. THE MOTIONS PENDING WILL BE HEARD ON 28/3/2018.” This is without hearing the reason why I was not in court. All she wanted was money. Our oil and gas that fuel the ignorance in the north is not enough. They wanted to collect yet more money from us, from the people they gave only 20 pounds after the war. From this ruling it was clear that all Binta Nyako wanted was the money. The same way she forced us to pay 40 million Naira cash to the Fulani run Zoo judiciary before releasing Madubugwu, Ishinwa, Onwudiwe and Nwawuisi. Ask yourselves this question, how many Boko Haram, ISIS, Fulani herdsmen and Fulani highway kidnappers in the north has the court ever asked to deposit cash before being granted bail? Check the enormity of their crime, compare that with what they claim we did and tell me who between Fulani killers and us peacefully asking for our freedom who should be paying cash bond.
Anyway let us go on with what Binta Nyako did. She adjourned the case for the sureties to 28/3/2019 for hearing of the pending motions only, as clearly ordered by the Court in the Surety proceedings of 14/11/2018 and not for my substantive hearing or revocation of bail hearing. This last point is important to bear in mind because you cannot call up a case that was not listed for hearing. This is standard practice of law all over the world, even under Sharia.
It is the RULE in every court of law in the world that both the Court and Parties are bound by the record of proceedings in a case before the Court. But as we shall see, a sitting judge (Binta Nyako) whose duty it is to uphold the law, in this case, acted in a manner that could only be described as judicial banditry by ambushing a defence lawyer in court. This is the legal equivalent of Fulani herdsmen on Adamawa Highway waylaying unsuspecting motorists. The very worst form of a criminally minded legal system that obtains in Nigeria.
When this case for the sureties came up for hearing on the 28th day of March, 2019 as directed by Binta Nyako, the Counsel to the 1st Surety informed the court that the 1st Surety has filed an appeal against the Court’s Ruling/order made on the 14/11/2018 and that the Appeal has been duly entered. The Appeal filed by Abaribe and the rest of my sureties is so simple that if you go through it, you will understand that Binta Nyako had no intention of following established court rules. There are three stages in forfeiture proceedings. The most important of which is reason to show cause. This reason to show cause allows the sureties to present their evidence before a court as to why they cannot produce a defendant they stood surety for. Shockingly, Binta Nyako never wanted to hear the reason why my sureties were unable to produce me. She jumped over two critical judicial processes, to demand that my sureties forfeit their bond and worse, be committed to detention without following what the law says should be done. This issue is the simple matter before the Appeal Court. The question is this, is it right for a judge to abandon laid down procedures in bail bond forfeiture without being heard? You can now understand why she did not insist that the badly worded ACJA legislation gave her the right to proceed with collecting N300 Million from my sureties or worse to jail them.
On that 28th day of March, 2019, Binta Nyako had no choice that to grant Abaribe’s application for stay of proceedings, and consequently adjourned the Surety Proceedings sine die, pending the outcome of the appeal at the Court of Appeal.
After adjourning the hearing of the surety proceedings, Binta Nyako without warning and contravention of the law and judicial practice, jumped into my trial there and then. No notice was given to my lawyers that there would be a hearing. Can anybody imagine a so-called senior judge ambushing a defence lawyer in a key trial with attending public interest? A supposed senior judge for that matter, who in all probably should be defending the due process of law. If a senior judge in Nigeria can have such little or no regard for the laws and rules of the court, how much more an uneducated impostor from Sudan that is running the Zoo?
The Zoo prosecutor called Labaran, merely applied orally to Binta Nyako for a revocation of my bail and the issuance of a bench warrant against me. This was the same Binta Nyako who on countless occasions said that she presides over a court of records- which means that all applications must be in writing for reference. Suddenly she agreed to hear the application for my bail revocation orally without it being written down. This is because she does not want the nonsensical application to be challenged by my lawyers. Despite the fact that my lawyer informed Binta Nyako that the issue relating to bail revocation was not scheduled for hearing on that 28/3/2019 Binta Nyako refused to listen, not minding that what she was doing was against the rules of procedure in her own court. But they are all Fulani and can do whatever they like after all Britain handed over Nigeria to them to do with as they please. This was the same judicial rascality that obtained when IPOB was proscribed without a court hearing. The decision to ban IPOB and tag us a terrorist movement was taken in the chambers of another badly educated Sharia Fulani judge Justice Abdul-Kafarati, the man that sentenced Ken Saro-Wiwa to death. You can see that Binta Nyako is towing the path of previous compromised Fulani government judges in doing the bidding of Aso Rock.
Despite all pleas to Binta Nyako to grant my lawyer time to respond, she refused but had it been it was the prosecution that asked for time extension, she would gladly oblige them. How many times have the Zoo prosecutor come to court to say the witness they promised to produce to testify against me is not yet ready and needed more time? Can she count how many times this had happened in her court?
Binta Nyako did not afford me the opportunity to be heard in the matter of my bail revocation, because justice and fairness demands that the prosecution submit a written application demanding for my bail revocation which would have met with a response from my lawyers. But it is clear that Binta Nyako did not want the atrocities the Fulani Nigerian army committed in my home to be a matter of court record. If she were to allow any written submissions, the invasion of my home with the attending atrocities will be placed before her court and she would be forced to enter a proper ruling on it which can be appealed against. What Binta Nyako cleverly did by ambushing my defence team is to make sure the issue of the attempt to kill me will not be mentioned in her court. This is the height of judicial injustice and perversion of justice.
Binta Nyako proceeded to revoke my bail, issued a bench warrant and directed that the trial commence in my absence at the next adjourned date despite the fact that my case was not listed to be heard on that 28/03/2019. My question to Binta Nyako is this……which Fuani terrorist is being tried in absentia? These are Fulani mass murderers killing in the name of jihad, world renowned terrorists like Miyetti Allah Cattle Breders Association, Shekau of Boko Haram, Al-Banarwi of Al Queda in West Africa. Al-Banarwi the son of Mohammed Yusuf the founder of Boko Haram and darling of the late Buhari, was granted bail in the same Federal High Court in Abuja and has since returned to killing and mass murder of Nigerians with little or no consequence. Has his bail been revoked? This is the question any right thinking should ask Binta Nyako.
One thing that has been established is that this order to revoke my bail without being heard is unconstitutional. The order was not only unconstitutional, but was made in contravention of Common Law legal procedure rules. Binta Nyako lied when she said there was nothing before her court. She conveniently forgot that I deposed to an affidavit in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/908/2017 which is the matter we brought before her between myself and Chief of Army Staff Buratai that led his Fulani soldiers to my house to kill me. In that suit, the reason why I cannot attend her court was well spelt out. My deposition was duly sworn before a Notary Public in the in State of Israel. A copy of the said sworn statement forwarded to my lawyers who duly filed it before Binta Nyako’s court..
It is a fact of court record that the Nigerian Army invaded my home and killed 28 people in Isiama Afaraukwu Abia State on the 17th day of September, 2017, in a murderous raid that left many more injured. 28 unarmed and defenseless persons were shot to death without any court order. Many were abducted and have not been seen till today. But some idiots, perhaps full of their own ignorance are somehow talking about my arrest as if the army are not culpable.
Let us see what the Supreme Court said about a court adhering to its business of the day or what they call Court’s own published case list and how that should be treated. Many Nigerians don’t know the meaning of Common Law or why is it that is said that Nigeria operate a Common Law system. So for the purposes of greater clarity this night, we shall first acquaint ourselves with the meaning of Common Law practice before we go further to expose the ignorance of the Nigerian judiciary as encapsulated in the pitiable performance of Binta Nyako. Let us look at the definition or meaning of Common Law.
